💰 Unit Cost Winner GPT-5 $2.50/1M in · $10.00/1M out
⚡ Latency & Speed Winner GPT-5 340ms TTFT · 105 tok/s
💻 Coding (SWE) Winner GPT-5 74.9% SWE-bench · 95.8% HumanEval
🧠 STEM Reasoning Winner Grok 4 86.2% GPQA · 97.6% MATH-500

Which model is better: GPT-5 or Grok 4?

GPT-5 and Grok 4 share identical input pricing at $2.50 per 1M tokens ($10.00 vs. $12.50 output). In terms of operational performance, GPT-5 delivers lower response latency at 340ms TTFT (140ms faster than Grok 4) with 105 vs. 95 tok/s throughput. GPT-5 leads coding evaluations at 74.9% SWE-bench Verified vs. 73.2% for Grok 4 and 85.4% vs. 86.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)

Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.

Metric / Dimension GPT-5 Grok 4 Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $2.50 $2.50 Identical Pricing
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $10.00 $12.50 GPT-5 (20.0% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M $0.625 $0.500 Grok 4 is 1.3x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M $2.50 $2.50 Identical Cache Write Pricing
Context Window (Max Output) 410k (128k out) 262k (66k out) GPT-5 (1.6x larger context)
Avg TTFT Response Latency 340ms 480ms GPT-5 (140ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput) 105 tok/s 95 tok/s GPT-5 (+10 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 74.9% 73.2% GPT-5 (+1.7% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM) 85.4% 86.2% Grok 4 (+0.8% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline) 90.8% 89.9% GPT-5 (+0.9% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic) 98% 97.6% GPT-5 (+0.4% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 59.2 / 100 57.6 / 100 GPT-5 (+1.6 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.

25.0M Tokens
500K 50M 250M 500M+
5.0M Tokens
100K 25M 75M 150M+
50% Cached
0% (Uncached) 25% 50% (Typical Agent) 95% Max

Estimated Monthly Spend

GPT-5 $89.06

$2.50/1M in · $10.00/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.625/1M read · $2.50/1M write

Grok 4 $100.00

$2.50/1M in · $12.50/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.500/1M read · $2.50/1M write

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$10.94 / mo
(10.9% lower cost with GPT-5)
Open Full Matchup Analysis →
A

When to Choose GPT-5

Choose GPT-5 (OpenAI) for complex enterprise automation, full-stack software engineering, multimodal agent orchestration, and scientific synthesis — offering a 409k context window, 340ms TTFT, and $2.50/1M input pricing ($0.625/1M cached reads).

B

When to Choose Grok 4

Choose Grok 4 (xAI) for real-time financial/market intelligence, PhD-level STEM problem solving, and autonomous code generation — offering a 262k context window, 480ms TTFT, and $2.50/1M input pricing ($0.500/1M cached reads).

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: GPT-5 or Grok 4?

Both GPT-5 and Grok 4 share identical input pricing at $2.50/1M tokens.

Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: GPT-5 or Grok 4?

GPT-5 delivers faster first-token latency at 340ms TTFT (105 tok/s throughput) compared to 480ms TTFT (95 tok/s) for Grok 4.

How do GPT-5 and Grok 4 compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?

On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, GPT-5 scores 74.9% versus 73.2% for Grok 4. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, GPT-5 scores 85.4% versus 86.2% for Grok 4 (and 98% vs 97.6% on MATH-500).

When should you choose GPT-5?

Choose GPT-5 (OpenAI) for complex enterprise automation, full-stack software engineering, multimodal agent orchestration, and scientific synthesis — offering a 409k context window, 340ms TTFT, and $2.50/1M input pricing ($0.625/1M cached reads).

When should you choose Grok 4?

Choose Grok 4 (xAI) for real-time financial/market intelligence, PhD-level STEM problem solving, and autonomous code generation — offering a 262k context window, 480ms TTFT, and $2.50/1M input pricing ($0.500/1M cached reads).

Explore High-Priority Related Model Matchups