Gemini 3.8 Flash
Proprietary CommercialDeveloped by Google · Hybrid Reasoning Multimodal MoE · Modalities: Text, Vision, Audio, Video · Released 2026-05-12
What are the token costs and operational benchmarks for Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Verified Capability Benchmarks
Composite Intelligence: 80.7/100Architectural & Production Profile
High-velocity 1M-context multimodal reasoning model balancing sub-110ms TTFT latency with deep agentic tool execution and configurable thinking levels.
High-throughput agentic workflows, real-time multimodal RAG, live search grounding, and production code generation at flash unit economics.
- Architecture
- Hybrid Reasoning Multimodal MoE
- Modalities
- Text, Vision, Audio, Video
- Max Output Tokens
- 65,536 tokens
- Blended Rate (3:1)
- $0.562 / 1M
Verified Cloud Inference Endpoints Hosting Gemini 3.8 Flash
Compare latency, streaming speed, and token pricing across cloud API providers.
| Inference Provider | Role | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Avg TTFT | Throughput |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Gemini & Vertex AI → | Primary Host | $0.25 | $1.50 | 105ms | 210 tok/s |
Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster
Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.
Estimated Monthly Spend
$0.25/1M in · $1.50/1M out
Prompt Cache: $0.025/1M read · $0.25/1M write
$2.00/1M in · $10.00/1M out
Prompt Cache: $0.100/1M read · $0.50/1M write
Head-to-Head Comparisons Involving Gemini 3.8 Flash (36)
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 87.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (8.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (745ms faster than Gemini 4 Argon) with 210 vs. 115 tok/s throughput. Gemini 4 Argon leads coding evaluations at 84.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 93.8% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude 4.5 Sonnet
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 91.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (12.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (275ms faster than Claude 4.5 Sonnet) with 210 vs. 84 tok/s throughput. Claude 4.5 Sonnet leads coding evaluations at 75.8% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 84.2% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 93.8% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $4.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $20.00 for output tokens (16.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (575ms faster than Claude Opus 5.5) with 210 vs. 95 tok/s throughput. Claude Opus 5.5 leads coding evaluations at 89.9% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 93.2% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 90.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.50 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (10.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (235ms faster than GPT-5) with 210 vs. 105 tok/s throughput. GPT-5 leads coding evaluations at 74.9% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 85.4% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 97.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $10.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $50.00 for output tokens (40.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (635ms faster than GPT-6 Astra) with 210 vs. 74 tok/s throughput. GPT-6 Astra leads coding evaluations at 75.7% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 96.0% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 81.1% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $1.32 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $3.96 for output tokens (5.3x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (415ms faster than DeepSeek V4 Pro) with 210 vs. 78 tok/s throughput. DeepSeek V4 Pro leads coding evaluations at 80.6% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 90.1% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek R1
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 54.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $0.55 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $2.19 for output tokens (2.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (1345ms faster than DeepSeek R1) with 210 vs. 58 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 49.2% for DeepSeek R1 and 79.2% vs. 71.5% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp)
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Exp) delivers superior capability at lower costs, while Gemini 3.8 Flash wins on speed. DeepSeek is 12.0% cheaper on input ($0.22 vs. $0.25) and $0.65 vs. $1.50 on output, leading SWE-bench (77.4% vs. 68.5%) and GPQA (91.3% vs. 79.2%). Gemini delivers 105ms TTFT (205ms faster) and 210 vs. 165 tok/s throughput.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs OpenAI o3
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 87.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $8.00 for output tokens (8.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (1045ms faster than OpenAI o3) with 210 vs. 82 tok/s throughput. OpenAI o3 leads coding evaluations at 71.7% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 87.7% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude 4 Opus
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 98.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $15.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $75.00 for output tokens (60.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (815ms faster than Claude 4 Opus) with 210 vs. 46 tok/s throughput. Claude 4 Opus leads coding evaluations at 77.2% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 87.1% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 91.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (12.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (435ms faster than Claude 3.7 Sonnet) with 210 vs. 72 tok/s throughput. Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads coding evaluations at 70.3% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 78.5% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 80.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $1.25 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (5.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (315ms faster than Gemini 3.1 Pro) with 210 vs. 98 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads coding evaluations at 71.8% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 82.4% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 90.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.50 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $12.50 for output tokens (10.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (375ms faster than Grok 4) with 210 vs. 95 tok/s throughput. Grok 4 leads coding evaluations at 73.2% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 86.2% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick is 20.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.20 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.60 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (1.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (30ms faster than Llama 4 Maverick) with 210 vs. 175 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 62.4% for Llama 4 Maverick and 79.2% vs. 73.8% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is 36.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.16 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.47 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (1.6x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (175ms faster than Qwen 3.8 Flash Next) with 210 vs. 185 tok/s throughput. Qwen 3.8 Flash Next leads coding evaluations at 81.0% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 91.7% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 70.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.07 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.30 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (3.3x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite delivers lower response latency at 78ms TTFT (27ms faster than Gemini 3.8 Flash) with 265 vs. 210 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 55.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and 79.2% vs. 68.4% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs OpenAI o4-mini
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 77.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $1.10 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $4.40 for output tokens (4.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (575ms faster than OpenAI o4-mini) with 210 vs. 125 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.1% for OpenAI o4-mini and 79.2% vs. 81.4% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 is 44.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.28 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (1.8x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (305ms faster than DeepSeek V3) with 210 vs. 78 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 42.0% for DeepSeek V3 and 79.2% vs. 59.1% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B IT
Gemma 4 31B IT is 52.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.36 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (2.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (10ms faster than Gemma 4 31B IT) with 210 vs. 155 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 59.2% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 79.2% vs. 71.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs OpenAI o3-mini
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 77.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $1.10 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $4.40 for output tokens (4.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (845ms faster than OpenAI o3-mini) with 210 vs. 98 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 49.3% for OpenAI o3-mini and 79.2% vs. 79.7% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 68.8% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $0.80 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $4.00 for output tokens (3.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (85ms faster than Claude 3.5 Haiku) with 210 vs. 130 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 40.6% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 79.2% vs. 41.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 91.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (12.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (205ms faster than Claude 3.5 Sonnet) with 210 vs. 80 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 49.0% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 79.2% vs. 59.4% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 60.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.10 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.40 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (2.5x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (175ms faster than Gemini 2.0 Flash) with 210 vs. 185 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 51.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash and 79.2% vs. 63.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 16.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $0.30 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $2.50 for output tokens (1.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (5ms faster than Gemini 2.5 Flash) with 210 vs. 180 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 58.0% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 79.2% vs. 70.5% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 80.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $1.25 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (5.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (595ms faster than Gemini 2.5 Pro) with 210 vs. 80 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 63.8% for Gemini 2.5 Pro and 79.2% vs. 74.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 28.6% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $0.35 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $1.00 for output tokens (1.4x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (55ms faster than GLM-5.3) with 210 vs. 120 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 56.0% for GLM-5.3 and 79.2% vs. 67.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash is 52.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.40 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (2.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, GLM-5.3-Flash delivers lower response latency at 90ms TTFT (15ms faster than Gemini 3.8 Flash) with 175 vs. 210 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 52.8% for GLM-5.3-Flash and 79.2% vs. 63.5% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-4o
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 90.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.50 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (10.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (175ms faster than GPT-4o) with 210 vs. 100 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 48.0% for GPT-4o and 79.2% vs. 53.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini is 40.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.15 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.60 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (1.7x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (115ms faster than GPT-4o Mini) with 210 vs. 140 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 41.0% for GPT-4o Mini and 79.2% vs. 40.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 87.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (8.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (415ms faster than GPT-6.1 Sol) with 210 vs. 135 tok/s throughput. GPT-6.1 Sol leads coding evaluations at 86.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 68.5% for Gemini 3.8 Flash and 92.4% vs. 79.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 3
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 91.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (12.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (515ms faster than Grok 3) with 210 vs. 88 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 65.8% for Grok 3 and 79.2% vs. 84.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 3 Mini
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 16.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $0.30 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $1.20 for output tokens (1.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (45ms faster than Grok 3 Mini) with 210 vs. 160 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 54.0% for Grok 3 Mini and 79.2% vs. 68.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 52.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.30 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (2.1x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (40ms faster than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct) with 210 vs. 165 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 42.5% for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 79.2% vs. 55.6% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mistral Large 2 (2411)
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 87.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $6.00 for output tokens (8.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (275ms faster than Mistral Large 2 (2411)) with 210 vs. 75 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 45.2% for Mistral Large 2 (2411) and 79.2% vs. 54.2% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs o1
Gemini 3.8 Flash is 98.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.25 vs. $15.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.50 vs. $60.00 for output tokens (60.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (2495ms faster than o1) with 210 vs. 48 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 48.9% for o1 and 79.2% vs. 78.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 27B
Qwen 3.8 27B is 20.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.20 vs. $0.25 per 1M tokens) and $0.60 vs. $1.50 for output tokens (1.2x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 3.8 Flash delivers lower response latency at 105ms TTFT (15ms faster than Qwen 3.8 27B) with 210 vs. 140 tok/s throughput. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads coding evaluations at 68.5% SWE-bench Verified vs. 58.4% for Qwen 3.8 27B and 79.2% vs. 68.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Frequently Asked Questions & Query Fan-Out
How much does Gemini 3.8 Flash cost per 1M tokens including prompt caching?
Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens. Cached input reads cost $0.025 per 1M tokens, reducing repeated context costs by 90%.
What are Gemini 3.8 Flash's coding and reasoning benchmark scores?
Gemini 3.8 Flash achieves 68.5% on SWE-bench Verified, 94.2% on HumanEval coding, 79.2% on GPQA Diamond graduate-level science, 87.4% on MMLU-Pro, and 95.1% on MATH-500, earning an overall Inference Value Ratio (IVR) of 74/100.
What is the context window, TTFT latency, and token throughput of Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash supports a 1,048,576 token context window (65,536 max output tokens) and operates at 105ms average Time to First Token (TTFT) with 210 tokens/sec output streaming throughput.
What are the primary production use cases for Gemini 3.8 Flash?
High-throughput agentic workflows, real-time multimodal RAG, live search grounding, and production code generation at flash unit economics.