💻 Coding (SWE) WinnerGPT-6.1 Sol 86.4% SWE-bench · 96.8% HumanEval
🧠 STEM Reasoning WinnerGPT-6.1 Sol 92.4% GPQA · 98.8% MATH-500
Which model is better: GLM-5.3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GLM-5.3 is 82.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.35 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $1.00 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (5.7x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, GLM-5.3 delivers lower response latency at 160ms TTFT (360ms faster than GPT-6.1 Sol) with 120 vs. 135 tok/s throughput. GPT-6.1 Sol leads coding evaluations at 86.4% SWE-bench Verified vs. 56.0% for GLM-5.3 and 92.4% vs. 67.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.
Zero-Shot RAG Verified
Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)
Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.
Metric / Dimension
GLM-5.3
GPT-6.1 Sol
Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens
$0.35
$2.00
GLM-5.3 is 5.7x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens
$1.00
$10.00
GLM-5.3 (90.0% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M
$0.090
$0.100
GLM-5.3 is 1.1x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M
$0.35
$2.00
GLM-5.3 is 5.7x cheaper
Context Window (Max Output)
131k (16k out)
1,075k (128k out)
GPT-6.1 Sol (8.2x larger context)
Avg TTFT Response Latency
160ms
520ms
GLM-5.3 (360ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput)
120 tok/s
135 tok/s
GPT-6.1 Sol (+15 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding)
56%
86.4%
GPT-6.1 Sol (+30.4% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM)
67%
92.4%
GPT-6.1 Sol (+25.4% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline)
80.5%
91%
GPT-6.1 Sol (+10.5% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic)
88%
98.8%
GPT-6.1 Sol (+10.8% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR)
69.9 / 100
62.9 / 100
GLM-5.3 (+7 pts)
Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster
Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.
Choose GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) for bilingual flagship foundation model optimized for cross-lingual reasoning, long-form structured analysis, and enterprise tool execution — offering a 131k context window, 160ms TTFT, and $0.35/1M input pricing ($0.090/1M cached reads).
Choose GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) for delivers near-GPT-6 Astra frontier accuracy at one-fifth the token cost with a 95% cache read discount for high-efficiency agentic coding, computer use, and enterprise workflow automation — offering a 1,075k context window, 520ms TTFT, and $2.00/1M input pricing ($0.100/1M cached reads).
GLM-5.3 is cheaper at $0.35/1M input tokens ($1.00/1M output) compared to $2.00/1M input ($10.00/1M output) for GPT-6.1 Sol.
Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: GLM-5.3 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
GLM-5.3 delivers faster first-token latency at 160ms TTFT (120 tok/s throughput) compared to 520ms TTFT (135 tok/s) for GPT-6.1 Sol.
How do GLM-5.3 and GPT-6.1 Sol compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?
On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, GLM-5.3 scores 56% versus 86.4% for GPT-6.1 Sol. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, GLM-5.3 scores 67% versus 92.4% for GPT-6.1 Sol (and 88% vs 98.8% on MATH-500).
When should you choose GLM-5.3?
Choose GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI) for bilingual flagship foundation model optimized for cross-lingual reasoning, long-form structured analysis, and enterprise tool execution — offering a 131k context window, 160ms TTFT, and $0.35/1M input pricing ($0.090/1M cached reads).
When should you choose GPT-6.1 Sol?
Choose GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) for delivers near-GPT-6 Astra frontier accuracy at one-fifth the token cost with a 95% cache read discount for high-efficiency agentic coding, computer use, and enterprise workflow automation — offering a 1,075k context window, 520ms TTFT, and $2.00/1M input pricing ($0.100/1M cached reads).
