Gemma 4 31B IT is 99.2% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $15.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.36 vs. $60.00 for output tokens (125.0x cost advantage). In terms of operational performance, Gemma 4 31B IT delivers lower response latency at 115ms TTFT (2485ms faster than o1) with 155 vs. 48 tok/s throughput. Gemma 4 31B IT leads coding evaluations at 59.2% SWE-bench Verified vs. 48.9% for o1 and 71.2% vs. 78.0% on GPQA Diamond.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.
Zero-Shot RAG Verified
Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta (12 Dimensions)
Daily synchronized metrics across token pricing, prompt cache economics, latency, throughput, and 5 capability benchmarks.
Metric / Dimension
Gemma 4 31B IT
o1
Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens
$0.12
$15.00
Gemma 4 31B IT is 125.0x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens
$0.36
$60.00
Gemma 4 31B IT (99.4% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M
$0.030
$7.500
Gemma 4 31B IT is 250.0x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M
$0.12
$15.00
Gemma 4 31B IT is 125.0x cheaper
Context Window (Max Output)
131k (16k out)
205k (100k out)
o1 (1.6x larger context)
Avg TTFT Response Latency
115ms
2600ms
Gemma 4 31B IT (2485ms faster)
Generation Speed (Throughput)
155 tok/s
48 tok/s
Gemma 4 31B IT (+107 tok/s faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding)
59.2%
48.9%
Gemma 4 31B IT (+10.3% lead)
GPQA Diamond (PhD STEM)
71.2%
78%
o1 (+6.8% lead)
MMLU-Pro (Multi-Discipline)
82.8%
83.3%
o1 (+0.5% lead)
MATH-500 (Quantitative Logic)
91.5%
96.4%
o1 (+4.9% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR)
80.3 / 100
37.2 / 100
Gemma 4 31B IT (+43.1 pts)
Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster
Model production workloads across prompt, completion, and cached context tokens, or switch models on the fly.
Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.12/1M input tokens ($0.36/1M output) compared to $15.00/1M input ($60.00/1M output) for o1.
Which model has lower TTFT latency and higher tok/s throughput: Gemma 4 31B IT or o1?
Gemma 4 31B IT delivers faster first-token latency at 115ms TTFT (155 tok/s throughput) compared to 2600ms TTFT (48 tok/s) for o1.
How do Gemma 4 31B IT and o1 compare on SWE-bench coding and GPQA Diamond reasoning?
On SWE-bench Verified software engineering, Gemma 4 31B IT scores 59.2% versus 48.9% for o1. On GPQA Diamond graduate-level STEM reasoning, Gemma 4 31B IT scores 71.2% versus 78% for o1 (and 91.5% vs 96.4% on MATH-500).
When should you choose Gemma 4 31B IT?
Choose Gemma 4 31B IT (Google) for self-hosted VPC inference, fine-tuned domain agents, sovereign healthcare/finance workloads, and low-latency local code generation — offering a 131k context window, 115ms TTFT, and $0.12/1M input pricing ($0.030/1M cached reads).
When should you choose o1?
Choose o1 (OpenAI) for legacy reasoning benchmarks, scientific literature review, and complex mathematical proofs — offering a 204k context window, 2600ms TTFT, and $15.00/1M input pricing ($7.500/1M cached reads).
