DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp
MIT Open SourceDeveloped by DeepSeek · Released 2026-02-10
What are the token costs and operational benchmarks for DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp?
Architectural Overview
Frontier foundation model developed by DeepSeek featuring MLA v4 Sparse MoE + Vision architecture.
Optimal Production Use Cases
Ultra-low-cost multimodal open weights with 1M context and multi-head latent attention for high-speed document and visual reasoning.
Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster
Model your expected production workload across prompt (input) and completion (output) tokens with prompt caching economics.
Estimated Monthly Spend
$0.14/1M in · $0.56/1M out
Prompt Cache: $0.014/1M read · $0.14/1M write
$0.10/1M in · $0.35/1M out
Prompt Cache: $0.020/1M read · $0.10/1M write
Head-to-Head Comparisons Involving DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 82.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.80 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $4.00 for output tokens (5.7x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (50ms faster than Claude 3.5 Haiku). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 40.6% for Claude 3.5 Haiku.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 95.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (21.4x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (170ms faster than Claude 3.5 Sonnet). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 49.0% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 95.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $15.00 for output tokens (21.4x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (510ms faster than Claude 3.7 Sonnet). Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads coding benchmarks at 70.3% SWE-bench vs. 64.2% for DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 74.5% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.55 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $2.19 for output tokens (3.9x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (1660ms faster than DeepSeek-R1). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 49.2% for DeepSeek-R1.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs DeepSeek V3
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers superior coding performance and speed at cost parity with DeepSeek V3.** Both models share identical $0.14 per 1M input tokens pricing, but DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp achieves a 140ms TTFT (270ms faster) and dominates coding benchmarks with 64.2% on SWE-bench versus 42.0% for DeepSeek V3.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 2.0 Flash is 28.6% cheaper for input tokens ($0.10 vs. $0.14 per 1M tokens) and $0.40 vs. $0.56 for output tokens (1.4x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (80ms faster than Gemini 2.0 Flash). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 28.0% for Gemini 2.0 Flash.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 53.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.30 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $2.50 for output tokens (2.1x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, Gemini 2.5 Flash delivers faster response latency with 110ms TTFT (30ms faster than DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 58.0% for Gemini 2.5 Flash.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers unmatched cost efficiency and performance over Gemini 2.5 Pro.** It is 88.8% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $1.25/M) and outputs cost $0.56 vs. $10.00/M. DeepSeek also achieves a 140ms TTFT (560ms faster) and slightly edges out coding benchmarks with 64.2% versus 63.8% on SWE-bench.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GLM-5.3
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 60.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.35 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $1.00 for output tokens (2.5x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (20ms faster than GLM-5.3). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 56.0% for GLM-5.3.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash is 14.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.14 per 1M tokens) and $0.40 vs. $0.56 for output tokens (1.2x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, GLM-5.3-Flash delivers faster response latency with 90ms TTFT (50ms faster than DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 52.8% for GLM-5.3-Flash.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-4.5
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp decisively outperforms GPT-4.5 at a fraction of the cost.** It is 99.8% cheaper ($0.14 input, $0.56 output vs. $75.00 and $150.00 per 1M tokens), while responding with a 140ms TTFT (710ms faster). Furthermore, DeepSeek dominates coding benchmarks, scoring 64.2% on SWE-bench compared to GPT-4.5’s 38.0%.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-4o
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 94.4% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $2.50 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $10.00 for output tokens (17.9x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (140ms faster than GPT-4o). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 48.0% for GPT-4o.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-4o Mini
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 6.7% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.15 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $0.60 for output tokens (1.1x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (80ms faster than GPT-4o Mini). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 41.0% for GPT-4o Mini.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 3
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp provides an overwhelming cost advantage over Grok 3 alongside superior speed.** DeepSeek is 95.3% cheaper for inputs ($0.14 vs. $3.00 per 1M tokens) and outputs ($0.56 vs. $15.00, a 21.4x difference). It also achieves faster 140ms TTFT (480ms faster), while Grok 3 narrowly leads coding benchmarks at 65.8% SWE-bench versus 64.2%.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Grok 3 Mini
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 53.3% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.30 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $1.20 for output tokens (2.1x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (10ms faster than Grok 3 Mini). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 54.0% for Grok 3 Mini.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp provides superior coding capability and speed over Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.** DeepSeek achieves 64.2% on SWE-bench versus 42.5%, delivering a rapid 140ms TTFT (310ms faster). Conversely, Llama is 14.3% cheaper on input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.14 per 1M) and more cost-effective on output ($0.30 vs. $0.56 per 1M).
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Mistral Large 2
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp decisively beats Mistral Large 2 on both cost and capability.** DeepSeek is 93.0% cheaper, pricing input tokens at $0.14 (versus $2.00) and output at $0.56 (versus $6.00) per 1M tokens. It responds faster with a 140ms TTFT (380ms advantage) while leading SWE-bench coding benchmarks at 64.2% versus 40.0%.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Mistral Large 2 (2411)
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 93.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $2.00 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $6.00 for output tokens (14.3x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers faster response latency with 140ms TTFT (310ms faster than Mistral Large 2411). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 35.7% for Mistral Large 2411.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs o1
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp delivers unmatched cost efficiency and speed over o1.** It is 99.1% cheaper at $0.14 input and $0.56 output per 1M tokens versus o1’s $15.00 and $60.00 (a 107.1x difference). Furthermore, it leads SWE-bench at 64.2% versus 48.9% and provides a 140ms TTFT, running 2460ms faster than o1.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs OpenAI o3-mini
**DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp outperforms OpenAI o3-mini across cost, speed, and benchmark capability.** DeepSeek is 87.3% cheaper, costing $0.14 versus $1.10 for inputs and $0.56 versus $4.40 for outputs per 1M tokens. Furthermore, it leads SWE-bench at 64.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen 3.8 27B
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp is 30.0% cheaper for input tokens ($0.14 vs. $0.20 per 1M tokens) and $0.56 vs. $0.60 for output tokens (1.4x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, Qwen 3.8 27B delivers faster response latency with 120ms TTFT (20ms faster than DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 58.4% for Qwen 3.8 27B.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen 3.8 Flash Next
Qwen 3.8 Flash Next is 28.6% cheaper for input tokens ($0.10 vs. $0.14 per 1M tokens) and $0.35 vs. $0.56 for output tokens (1.4x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, Qwen 3.8 Flash Next delivers faster response latency with 95ms TTFT (45ms faster than DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp). DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp leads coding benchmarks at 64.2% SWE-bench vs. 61.0% for Qwen 3.8 Flash Next.
Frequently Asked Questions & Query Fan-Out
How much does DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp cost per 1M tokens?
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.14 per million prompt (input) tokens and $0.56 per million completion (output) tokens.
What is the context window for DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp?
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp supports a maximum context window of 1,048,576 tokens, with a maximum single-generation output of 32,768 tokens.
What are the primary use cases for DeepSeek-V4 Flash Vision Exp?
Ultra-low-cost multimodal open weights with 1M context and multi-head latent attention for high-speed document and visual reasoning.