Which model is better: Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) is 57.1% cheaper for input tokens ($0.12 vs. $0.28 per 1M tokens) and $0.36 vs. $0.84 for output tokens (2.3x cost difference). In terms of operational performance, Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) delivers faster response latency with 110ms TTFT (370ms faster than Qwen 2.5 Max). Qwen 2.5 Max leads coding benchmarks at 44.2% SWE-bench vs. 42.1% for Microsoft Phi-4 (14B).
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta

Daily synchronized metrics from synthetic latency endpoints and benchmark evaluations.

Metric / Dimension Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) Qwen 2.5 Max Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $0.12 $0.28 Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) is 2.3x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $0.36 $0.84 Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) (57.1% lower)
Avg TTFT Response Latency 110ms 480ms Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) (+370ms faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 42.1% 44.2% Qwen 2.5 Max (+2.1% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 99.9 / 100 99.9 / 100 Qwen 2.5 Max (+0 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model your expected production workload across prompt (input) and completion (output) tokens.

Live Calculation Engine
10.0M Tokens
100K 50M 250M 500M+
2.5M Tokens
100K 10M 50M 100M+

Estimated Monthly Spend

Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) $5.45

$0.12/1M in · $0.36/1M out

Qwen 2.5 Max $67.50

$0.28/1M in · $0.84/1M out

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$62.05 / mo
(91.9% lower cost)
A

When to Choose Microsoft Phi-4 (14B)

Choose Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) when you need High-efficiency local math reasoning, embedded device processing, on-device SLM logic, and low-latency classification. and have an infrastructure budget aligned with $0.12/1M tokens.

B

When to Choose Qwen 2.5 Max

Choose Qwen 2.5 Max when you need High-performance enterprise reasoning across Asian and Western languages with advanced structured output handling. and prioritize Alibaba Cloud ecosystem integration at $0.28/1M tokens.

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) is cheaper at $0.12/1M input tokens compared to $0.28/1M for Qwen 2.5 Max.

Which model has lower latency: Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) or Qwen 2.5 Max?

Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) delivers faster response times with an average TTFT of 110ms vs 480ms for Qwen 2.5 Max.

When should you choose Microsoft Phi-4 (14B)?

Choose Microsoft Phi-4 (14B) when you need High-efficiency local math reasoning, embedded device processing, on-device SLM logic, and low-latency classification. and have an infrastructure budget aligned with $0.12/1M tokens.

When should you choose Qwen 2.5 Max?

Choose Qwen 2.5 Max when you need High-performance enterprise reasoning across Asian and Western languages with advanced structured output handling. and prioritize Alibaba Cloud ecosystem integration at $0.28/1M tokens.

Explore Related Model Matchups