Which model is better: o1 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

**Qwen 3.8 27B delivers superior developer performance at an overwhelmingly lower price than o1.** Qwen is 98.7% cheaper on input tokens ($0.20 vs. $15.00/1M) and output tokens ($0.60 vs. $60.00/1M). It drastically improves response speed with a 120ms TTFT (2480ms faster) and leads coding benchmarks with 58.4% on SWE-bench versus 48.9% for o1.
Verified daily via automated API latency tests and official documentation.

Verified Performance & Unit Economics Delta

Daily synchronized metrics from synthetic latency endpoints and benchmark evaluations.

Metric / Dimension o1 Qwen 3.8 27B Net Delta / Advantage
Input Cost / 1M Tokens $15.00 $0.20 Qwen 3.8 27B is 75.0x cheaper
Output Cost / 1M Tokens $60.00 $0.60 Qwen 3.8 27B (99.0% lower)
Prompt Cache Read / 1M $7.500 $0.050 Qwen 3.8 27B is 150.0x cheaper
Prompt Cache Write / 1M $15.00 $0.20 Qwen 3.8 27B is 75.0x cheaper
Avg TTFT Response Latency 2600ms 120ms Qwen 3.8 27B (+2480ms faster)
SWE-bench Verified (Coding) 48.9% 58.4% Qwen 3.8 27B (+9.5% lead)
Inference Value Score (IVR) 35.5 / 100 75.7 / 100 Qwen 3.8 27B (+40.2 pts)

Interactive Monthly Token Economics & ROI Forecaster

Model your expected production workload across prompt (input) and completion (output) tokens with prompt caching economics.

Live Calculation Engine
10.0M Tokens
100K 50M 250M 500M+
2.5M Tokens
100K 10M 50M 100M+

Estimated Monthly Spend

o1 $300.00

$15.00/1M in · $60.00/1M out

Prompt Cache: $7.500/1M read · $15.00/1M write

Qwen 3.8 27B $3.50

$0.20/1M in · $0.60/1M out

Prompt Cache: $0.050/1M read · $0.20/1M write

Projected Monthly Cost Reduction
$296.50 / mo
(98.8% lower cost with Qwen 3.8 27B)
A

When to Choose o1

Choose o1 when you need Heavyweight reasoning model engineered for academic research, complex mathematics, and deep multimodal analysis. and have an infrastructure budget aligned with $15.00/1M tokens.

B

When to Choose Qwen 3.8 27B

Choose Qwen 3.8 27B when you need High-performance 27B open weights optimized for local deployment, code generation, and low-latency production pipelines. and prioritize Alibaba Cloud ecosystem integration at $0.20/1M tokens.

Related Questions & Decision Factors

Which is cheaper: o1 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Qwen 3.8 27B is cheaper at $0.20/1M input tokens compared to $15.00/1M for o1.

Which model has lower latency: o1 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Qwen 3.8 27B delivers faster response times with an average TTFT of 120ms vs 2600ms for o1.

When should you choose o1?

Choose o1 when you need Heavyweight reasoning model engineered for academic research, complex mathematics, and deep multimodal analysis. and have an infrastructure budget aligned with $15.00/1M tokens.

When should you choose Qwen 3.8 27B?

Choose Qwen 3.8 27B when you need High-performance 27B open weights optimized for local deployment, code generation, and low-latency production pipelines. and prioritize Alibaba Cloud ecosystem integration at $0.20/1M tokens.

Explore Related Model Matchups